News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers.
What factors do you think influence these decisions?
Do we become used to bad news, and would it be better if more good news was reported?
It is definitely a fact that editors have to make quite tough decisions regarding what sort of news stories they should broadcast or print, and their choices are undoubtedly influenced by a variety of factors. From my perspective, we are exposed to too much bad news, and I would place a greater emphasis on good news.
Editors are often confronted with a range of considerations when determining what news stories to focus on. First of all, I firmly believe that they have to ponder over whether viewers or readers will be interested enough to opt for a TV channel or a daily newspaper over those competitive providers. Secondly, news editors have a responsibility to inform the public about important events and issues, and they should therefore prioritize stories that conform to the public interest.
It seems to me that people do become accustomed to negative news. We are exposed on a daily basis to stories about war, crime, natural disasters and tragic human suffering around the world. I believe that such repeated exposure gradually desensitizes people, and we become more cynical about the world and more skeptical that we can do anything to change it. Consequently, I would prefer to see more optimistic reports, such as the rescue work of medical staff after natural disasters, or the generosity of volunteers who offer help in their communities. This kind of news might inspire us all to lead better lives.
In conclusion, it must be extremely uneasy for editors to choose what news stories to present, but I am inclined to see a more positive report for this crucial public service.